QA Risk Review
A focused independent view of product risk through exploratory testing. The clearest starting point when the scope is uncertain.
View QA Risk Review →Independent software QA for product teams
One QA partner who actually learns your product.
Exploratory QA, release testing and regression support for product teams that need experienced external quality ownership, with Playwright automation added when repeatable coverage genuinely makes sense.
Work directly with Catalin Diac · EU-based · Async-friendly · ISTQB Foundation · NDA-ready discussions
Why Bright Testing
Your QA shouldn't reset every sprint.
Continuity creates better product judgement. The same QA partner learns critical journeys, fragile areas and release history, then turns that context into stronger regression coverage and, where useful, automation.
See the approachStart with the problem
Choose the smallest useful QA engagement.
You do not need to buy a large testing programme to start.
Release QA
Coverage around a launch, high-risk change or release that needs independent verification.
View Release QA →Continuous QA Partner
Ongoing external QA capacity with product context that compounds over time.
View ongoing QA →Trusted in real product work
Why teams choose Bright Testing.
Direct QA collaboration, clear reporting and attention to the edge cases that matter. Here is what that looked like with ARI Auto Repair Software.
“Great overall experience working with Catalin. Reports were well documented, testing covered important edge cases, and he proactively suggested improvements when relevant. Highly recommend.”
Product Manager · ARI Auto Repair Software
See the ARI example →
Next step
Not sure how much QA you need?
Send me your product, release stage and biggest concern. I'll recommend the smallest useful QA scope rather than automatically selling you the largest package.
Request a QA proposal